The election of 2016 has been a rollercoaster ride of insults and corruption and displaced moral outrage. Much has been made of Trump's personality and his failures as a decent human being. But little has been said substantially by the mainstream media about the corruption of Clinton and her relationship with her big dollar supporters.
Let's take one issue, the North Dakota pipeline and examine each candidates sentiments. The most significant issue facing mankind today is environmental protection from energy producing companies such as those involved with the construction of the pipeline.
Trump's feelings on the pipeline are revealed in an article in the Guardian:
"Trump’s financial disclosure forms show the Republican nominee has between $500,000 and $1m invested in Energy Transfer Partners, with a further $500,000 to $1m holding in Phillips 66, which will have a 25% stake in the Dakota Access project once completed."
Where a mans treasure is you will find his heart. With his heart set on producing a product which is certain to strike a blow to the bio systems which support and sustain life on earth we can dismiss Trump for those decisions alone.
Now how about Clinton? Where can we expect Clinton's loyalties to lie when it comes to the pipeline? The website Common Dreams reports:
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton released a statement on Thursday about the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) fight—and it says "literally nothing.""
Those familiar with the track record of Clinton will see this as part of a pattern with her behavior. Traditionally Clinton has only sided with those who have been in power and making the decisions as this June 6, 2016 Salon article reveals. Her association with the Bush cabal of (see Mother Jones article at link) neo-liberal advisers is something which should not be overlooked when assessing the impact her leadership will have on the nation and the future of the American people.
So we've come down to the end of the election propaganda season here and thanks to WikiLeaks and reporters like H.A. Goodman we have the straight dope on how to correctly assess the problems a Clinton Presidency would create for most of us in the country. This segment titled: WIKILEAKS 1-30: Podesta's Devilish Spirit Cooking Dinner and Hillary's Faith in God and Bible"
If you are not familiar with Hillary Clinton's religion here is an article that explains her faith and subsequent worldview. She worships with a theocratic Christian group named "The Family". As revealed in the Alternet article at the link.
What has this got to do with anything? Well if memory serves me right it was George Bush's God that instructed him in the early years of this millennium to begin the wars that have laid waste to countless members of the human race and evoked feelings of hatred and division so great it has destroyed the soul of the nation. Like Bush, Clinton is also influenced by the teaching of the Methodists. Who will God tell her to attack? Is this what one nation under God means?
Interestingly enough people are already considering which are the areas into which war will be extended. 5 Places Where World War Three Could Break Out. From what you know about Clinton what do you think her Presidency will look like?
I'll be voting for Jill Stein
The rest of you are just out of luck